Dear Readers,
I have a little bit more to say about absolutes, commitments, exaggeration, figurative language, etc., and then I can put this subject to rest, for tonight anyway.
Elder Jeffrey R. Holland said to young LDS women in November 2005, “Everything Christ taught He taught to women as well as men.” When I read that I thought: That’s not literally true. Christ had secret meetings with his twelve male apostles, you know. Christ taught Joseph Smith stuff that Joseph Smith couldn’t tell anybody else, men or women.
So why did Elder Holland have to talk in absolutes like that? Well, I think we all agree that the spirit of what Elder Holland was something like, God loves women just as much as he loves men, and even though the leadership of the Church has a patriarchal structure, that doesn’t mean… well, you know what I’m saying. There’s no need for me to re-write what has already been adequately expressed. Read the Family, A Proclamation to the World for further insight on LDS gender roles.
Again from the Nov. 2005 Holland talk, we read, “Fathers and mothers, prophets and apostles have no motive except to bless your life and to spare you every possible heartache we can spare you.” That’s not literally true either. Sometimes parents, like abusive parents, have very bad motives. Holland doesn’t say, “all fathers and mothers” but when there is no qualifier, no “some” or “most,” then “all” is assumed.
I mean, what do you think when you read the sentence, “Male lions sleep twenty hours a day.”
Do you think that that statement means that a few male lions sleep 20 hours a day now and then? Or do you assume that the statement means that all male lions typically sleep 20 hours a day? That’s what I assume. I mean, as long as their slumber isn’t interrupted by something out of the ordinary like a volcano erupting nearby, you know, then the meaning that I get from “male lions sleep 20 hours a day” is “all male lions typically sleep 20 hours a day.”
Why is Holland leading us to believe that all parents everywhere have righteous motives for everything they do?
A good way to think about why Holland worded his talk the way he did is to think of his alternative. Imagine the absurdity that would abound if absolutes were strictly avoided and everything would have to be qualified, qualified, qualified! Like, instead of saying the powerful statement, “Fathers and mothers, prophets and apostles have no motive except to bless your life and to spare you every possible heartache we can spare you,” Holland would have had to say something like, “Many fathers and mothers, and many true prophets and apostles, mostly want to bless your life and to spare you many trials and heartaches. Some parents are bad, though, so you’ve got to watch out for them. And some prophets are false, too, but I think most of them are pretty good. I think I’m pretty good anyway.”
I’ve thought a lot about this stuff before. Here’s something I wrote a while ago, on the absolutes and exaggerated language in scripture topic: (It’s copied and pasted from a comment I made on Telemoonfa Time after the “Seeking Utopia” post)
I know the scriptures say, “With God all things are possible.” (Mark 10: 27) But… I guess I don’t take that Scripture literally. Because in another scripture, D + C 82:10, it says, “I the Lord am bound when ye do what I say, but when ye do not what I say, ye have no promise.” So, it is not possible for God to deny his word when people keep up their end of the bargain- that’s at least one thing he can’t do. I don’t think God could just stop existing, either. And God cannot give an inheritance in the Celestial Kingdom to somebody who is unfit for it. (I’m reminded of this funny/ dumb riddle thing: could God create a rock that was so heavy that he couldn’t pick it up?) I believe, and I’ve heard it expressed by Mormons before, that God is governed by certain eternal principles, like mercy and justice. God has to follow rules, too. God can’t make 2 plus 2 equal 5.
But doesn’t “With god all things are possible” have more oomph than “With God many unlikely things are possible?”
In conclusion, we live in a fallen world, and humans use a fallen means of communication: spoken and written language. I believe in a transcendent, heavenly communication- I believe in telepathy, the Holy Ghost, and other metaphysical/spiritual forms of communication that cannot be subjected to current scientific or logical scrutiny.
Communication will be so much cooler in the Celestial Kingdom. “For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.” (1 Corinthians 13:12)
Sincerely,
Telemoonfa
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think Holland said Jesus taught to men and women just because its more effective than saying, "Everything Jesus for the most part, is aimed at both men and women"
its just not as rhetorical.
And Rhetoric is why we talk at all, trying to convince somebody about your opinion or fact or somethin'
And Abusive parents don't want the best for their children, no. But it is expected of a parent from the Proclamation to the family to want the best for their children.
I used to have the proclamation memorized. but the last paragraph says soemthing to the effect that:
Individuals who fail to uphold these principles will bring the calamities foretold by the prophets of old. (I'm sure I didn't quote it right.
That's awesome that you memorized the Procalmation, Sparrow. I did also once. Even though you and I could probably not recite it from memory today, I think we both got something good out of the exercise.
"With God, many unlikely things are possible." I think I will start using that. Of course, as soon as I do, someone in Sunday School will say, "No, not many things are possible, all things are possible" and then the next 10 minutes of class will be wasted.
The Boid
Post a Comment