Friday, March 20, 2009

Photoshopped Sepulchers

Dear Readers,

I’m kind of upset about something.

A few years ago, when I was home from college during a Thanksgiving break, my family got a family portrait taken. My mother bought us all matching outfits for the occasion. I remember my acne was much worse than it is now.

A few weeks after that Thanksgiving Break, when I was home for Christmas Break, I looked at our family portrait, and I noticed that my face in the picture was very clear. Strangely clear. I looked at the picture and I looked in the mirror, and I was shocked that just a few weeks ago, my complexion was pimple-free. But I just thought, “Well, my acne comes and goes in spurts, and I’m lucky that my face was clear on the day those photos were taken.”

A month or so later, though, I found out the truth. My mother told my sister, and my sister told my girlfriend (who is now my wife) and my girlfriend told me. My face had been photo-shopped. Airbrushed. The photographer erased all my acne using computer technology.

When my girlfriend told me about the doctored-up photos, I was confused and angry. I wanted to drive all the way to my parents’ house and burn all those pictures, because they were lies. I felt as though my mother, the photographer, and everybody else who knew about it had entered into a conspiracy against me.

Of course they had good intentions, and of course they felt like they had my best interest in mind. Maybe they thought that I would have liked it. Or maybe the airbrushing wasn’t premeditated at all. Maybe the photographer said at the last minute, “Hey, for another $50, I can make all of Telemoonfa’s acne disappear,” and my parents agreed to it without consulting me. Who knows.

And I remember feeling then, as I sort of feel now, that I should at least have ownership of my own image. (Alas, we don’t have absolute control over the way we are perceived.)

But I couldn’t burn those pictures or throw them away. They were expensive family photographs. Plus, they had already been dispersed throughout my extended family. To round all those pictures up and destroy them would have been a formidable task. And I would have faced mountains of opposition from my family members, especially from my mother. The whole thing would have been very embarrassing, and I didn’t want to start a fight, so I just tried to forget about the whole thing, and I never brought it up to my family.

The bottom line is, my mother wanted to think that she had a son without acne, and so that what she has in the picture. A son without acne. Good for her. She has what she wants. A picture in the hallway of me with clear skin. A representation of a face that never existed.

Does my mother realize, though, that by altering those photographs, she’s altering history?

But I suppose altering history and hiding unpleasant facts are only natural, motherly things to do. People do it all the time in scrapbooks, in yearbooks, in photo albums, on myspace pages, on facebook pages, in journals, in blogs, in press conferences, at Church on Sunday, in Christmas family newsletters, on resumes, in job interviews, at family reunions, at high school reunions, in sales pitches, at company parties, and the list goes on and on and on.

The past gets glorified. The unpleasant things about people are swept under the rug.

Like just look at this post I recently read from Gunnell Family Happenings: http://mjgunnellfamily.blogspot.com/2009/03/st-patricks-day.html (It’s a blog I follow. I think Gunnell Family Happenings can be seen as a representative of many cutesy-wutesy family blogs) The post is about how the Gunnell family went to the park on St. Patrick’s day. I’ll sum it up for you. It says:

“The weather is gorgeous. It’s a nice day. The kids are gorgeous. The gorgeous kids feed the ducks. It’s St. Patrick’s Day, so the festive, happy people that work at the park made the water green. Mrs. Gunnell’s children enjoy their childhood, and Mrs. Gunnell enjoys her adulthood. Everything is gorgeous. What a nice family the Gunnells have. The End.”

I don’t mean to show disrespect for the Gunnell’s blog. It’s very nice, and it fulfills its purpose nicely.

Very few people are capable of depicting themselves honestly.

And what is honesty, anyway?

Matthew 23:27:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye are like unto whited sepulchers, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones…”

Sincerely,
Telemoonfa

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Much. Ado. About. Nothing.

What is wrong with photoshopping away blemishes in a family photo? Nothing. It is hardly rewriting history. Rewriting history would be if a different person was substituted by photoshop.

Remember that time we were in Utah and we took that really old picture of one of our ancestors to a photographer so he could touch it up and he made it look great? Remember how lovely the skin was on that photo? Do you think the person's real skin was as smooth as that photo even before the guy made it look better with photoshop? Of course not. Is it dishonoring our forebearers to smooth out skin. No. Is is dishonoring you? No.

Long before airbrushing and photoshop, people's images have always been subject to manipulation for the better. Do you think David looked the way Michaelangelo depicted him? No way. Probably not even close. But because David was such a revered figure, he was depicted with a perfect body. Becasue you are such a revered person in the family, you were depticted with smooth skin.

What's that song? "You've got to ac-cent-u-ate the positive E-lim-in-ate the negative..." Words of wisdom form Bing Crosby.

Do you interpret Matthew 23:27 to mean that we should not make attempts to hide any imperfections?

The Boid

telemoonfa said...

Thanks for your feedback.

While I was writing this post, I kind of felt like a whiner, and that I was making a big deal out of nothing.

I'm really not that upset about it. It was a long time ago, and it's not a big deal.

But I do think photoshopping pictures is a form of rewriting history. When I look at a picture of a person from a long time ago, I usually think that the photo is genuine. Maybe I shouldn’t be so naive.

Some might argue, “What difference does retouching photos make? It’s no big deal. It doesn’t change anything important. It doesn’t alter any important facts.” Well, retouching photos must be a big deal because people put a lot of time, money, and stress into retouching photos.

I watched a thing on YouTube recently about girls' body image and photoshopping and airbrushing and such. This guy said that 99% of all the pictures of celebrities or models in magazines have been retouched, to make them skinnier and such. And celebrities hire personal photographers, or people that look after every image of them and make sure it meets the celebrities’ specifications. And I just get tired of all that fakeness.

Although I guess I like the picture of me without zits better than the picture of me with zits. I have conflicting emotions about it.

Funny, for some reason I never thought that David was a real person, but I suppose he could have been. Is that the David from the Bible?

No, I don't remember the way one of our ancestors' photos got touched up. I was not aware of that.

No I don't interpret Matthew 23:27 that way. I just put that in there because I think it sort of applies to what I was talking about. Looking one way on the outside and being another way on the inside. Presenting a false front. Meticulously controlling one's public appearance. People make themselves look better than they really are all the time, and I guess for the most part that's fine. As long as you don’t get too vain.

Anonymous said...

Well. I kinda agree with you, I look really different in on of the pictures.

people (welll some people) want to look perfect , and in their speaking, they're not being dishonest, they're appreciating whats there that deserves appreciation.

(this reminds me of a previous post, the one with the personal trainers using lies to make you better)

I really couldn't care less about acne. seeing a picture of you with acne is only going to make me remember you and all the good times we shared.
Seeing a picture without acne is also going to make me remember you.

Pictures are just for thinking about, retouching your face doesn't affect who you are. or who you are to other people.

And we can't control how we are percieved. no, but people are still gonna love you!