Newt Gingrich vs. Al Gore and Henry Waxman

Dear Readers,

Congratulations to Newt Gingrich and John Boehner and a lot of other global warming skeptics who have stood up to Al Gore and Democrats that are trying to pass the scary climate change / global warming / cap and trade bill. Newt is a pretty cool guy. One of the best things he said is, "We did not create the transcontinental railroad by punishing stagecoaches." He said that to illustrate that taxing "dirty energy" like oil and gas and coal to death is not the way to get "clean energy" developed.

Al Gore is totally crazy because he says stuff like industrialization causes global warming and he wants there to be worldwide laws to stop industrialization. (Except for him and his buddies. He likes cars and electricity and lots of other techno-stuff. He's rich.) And Al Gore wants there to be BRUTE FORCE, WORLDWIDE, and FULL OF MONEY (That's Allen Ginsberg poetry) measures to force everyone to pay him lots of money to be able to use electricity. He says industrialization is bad.

But I love industrialization! And so do you! You're reading this on a computer, and that takes electricity, and the electricity probably comes from greehouse gas emitting power plants...

OK and you know what else? Even if bark beetles are chomping on tree bark in Canada becasue of global warming, I don't care. And even if underwater animals with exoskeletons die becasue of global warming, um... I don't care about that either. Animals adapt to a lot of stuff, and global warming isn't real and it's ala-swiffert woopert.

I've watched Henry Waxman quite a bit lately, and boy is he really annoying. And it strikes me as funny that all the politicians from California that I know of are really quiffert. Arnold is quiff, Nancy Pelosi is quiff, Barbara Boxer is quiff, Henry Waxman is quiff, and Dianne Feinstein is quiff. Are there any politicians from California that aren't quiff these days?

Sincerely,

Telemoonfa